The politics of tribe in Malawi

By Nyasa Times
Published: November 26, 2009
The cultural festival of the Lhomwe tribe took place on 25 October in the village of Chonde in the Mulanje District of southern Malawi, its Malawian heartland. This is close to the Mozambican border over which this group migrated in the course of the last two centuries and across which chiefs Mutharika (whose name Bingu borrowed when he tired of his original name of Brightson Webster Thom), Nasiyaya, Mpeni and Khoromana came for this celebration. It was attended by the Lhomwe’s most prominent member, President Bingu wa Mutharika, and thus attracted to this small village in the shadow of Mulanje mountain a crowd estimated at 40,000; also a large number of official limousines and military uniforms, a television crew from the state-owned Malawi Broadcasting Corporation, many yards of Mulhako wa Alhomwe cloth, and a host of soft drinks traders to serve the usual thirsts of the country’s hot season. It was a peaceful and colourful festival which the President insisted, in his opening speech, was “non-political”. “Some critics”, he explained “suggested that I should not come to this function because I am president of this country …. But the Mulhako is non-political. It is about promoting Alhomwe cultural and traditional values including our language” [Daily Times 26/10/09]
It is Malawi’s misfortune that almost everything a president does is political. When its first president, Hastings Kamuzu Banda, shifted the country’s capital-city from Zomba to the heartland of the Chewa people, at Lilongwe in the Central Region, and made their language into the official one of Malawi, it was a political act against the Tumbuka-speakers of the North and the Yao and Ngoni peoples of the south, however justified by the brutal logic of modern state-building. When Malawi’s second president, Bakili Muluzi, made public appointments from his own Yao people, and was seen to be favouring the Yaos’ Muslim faith over Christian ones, and to be building more roads and power lines in their Mangochi district than elsewhere, he was strongly criticised too. The fact that post-independence Malawi has escaped large-scale ethnic violence, and is proud of its peaceful and friendly spirit, cannot altogether conceal those bitter ethnic resentments and jealousies that plague other African states and which lie close to Malawi’s surface at all times. A president’s favour or disfavour can make or break an entire region’s economy, just as they can do for individual careers, and if those favours and disfavours are seen to be based on tribe, then resentments gain political force and coherence.
Suspicions of Bingu’s ethnic favouritism had already surfaced before the Chonde gathering. The arrival there of official limousines containing Lhomwe Cabinet ministers such as Patricia Kaliati, Anna Kachikho, George Chaponda, Richie Muheya, and the President’s own brother and minister of Justice, Peter, was not the only occasion for a counting of Lhomwe heads in Bingu’s government. Lhomwes at the head of the Anti Corruption Bureau (Alex Nampota), the police service (Peter Mukhito), the Malawi Electoral Commission (Anastasia Msosa); of government-owned corporations such as the Agricultural Development and Marketing Corporation (Charles Matabwa) and the Malawi Social Action Fund (Edward Sawerengera); of Principal Secretaries of major government departments (Joseph Mwanamvekha is the latest on the scene: Chairman of Mulhako wa Alhomwe, and since October, Chief Secretary to the Treasury); the Chief Justice (Lovemore Munlo) and the Attorney-General (Jane Ansah) – all these Lhomwes in high places had been noted with varying degrees of alarm. Nor were the sellers of soft drinks the only businessmen at Chonde to profit by their proximity to greatness. Leston Mulli, the rapidly rising star of the Malawian business community, with a multitude of blossoming investments in Malawi’s freight and passenger transport, tourism and timber concessions, and in Mulanje District’s large tea estates, was there too as patron of the event. He too is a Lhomwe and the brother of Felton, another of Bingu’s cabinet ministers.
The suspicion of Mutharika’s “tribalism” by members of Malawi’s twenty , or so, other ethnic groups expresses itself in many different ways. The veteran Sena-speaking political baron of the Lower Shire valley, Gwanda Chakuamba, who was leader of the powerful Mgwirizano Coalition in the 2004 elections, and who now leads the New Republican Party, was recently convicted (but not punished because of his age and growing eccentricity) of incitement to violence against the Lhomwe people. He told a crowd in November 2008 that the Lhomwe were becoming “cheeky” and deserved to be beaten-up. More significant, perhaps, was the more recent action of Harry Mkandawire, a powerful figure in Malawi’s Northern Region and (until his sacking last month) within the ruling Democratic Progressive Party hierarchy. His “Open Letter” to the President of 22 October expressed the concerns of Malawi’s northern, largely Chitumbuka-speaking, peoples, who had given Bingu overwhelming support in the recent general election, but who now feel sidelined and ignored by him. Mkandawire’s particular complaints were directed against the reintroduction of Kamuzu Banda’s old regional quotas for the selection of university students (because northerners were, and are, seen to be over-represented in the student population); and the Southern bias in Bingu’s appointments to government departments and corporations. He expressed a particular concern about Mulhako wa Alhomwe: “As the President of Malawi, you are expected to … embrace all tribes and their cultures. It is a paradox for you to be looked upon as favouring one tribe which is synonymous with being called a tribalist”.
Malawi’s ethnic and regional politics are, for the time being, balanced by a growing sense of a common, non-violent, Malawian culture. Its tribalism is often expressed in a healthy respect for cultural ties across those political frontiers established by nineteenth-century European colonialists with little knowledge or respect for such things. It still offers important solidarities and reassuring cultural identities and it allows the presidents of Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia, Tanzania and South Africa to celebrate their common Chewa, Zulu, Lhomwe, Tumbuka, heritages as easily as their own people have always done . Bingu may be genuinely innocent of deliberate tribalism. His Democratic Progressive Party on the approach to the 2009 elections did well in the Tumbuka-speaking North, the Chewa-speaking Centre and the Sena-speaking South. But he has to be careful to ensure that the legacy he leaves for Malawi in 2014 will be the golden one he anticipates. He hopes that it will be that of the modern Moses, leading all of his people to the Promised Land of economic and political security. But it could be that of Humpty Dumpty on the wall in the popular nursery-rhyme of another cultural tradition, who carelessly fell off and could not be put together again. The tribal politics of Kibaki’s Kenya are a grim warning to Malawi of what happens when a president becomes careless with tribal politics. Malawians familiar with Michela Wrong’s “It’s Our Turn to Eat”, are now openly wondering whose turn it will be “to eat” after the Lhomwes of Malawi leave the dining-table

The cultural festival of the Lhomwe tribe took place on 25 October in the village of Chonde in the Mulanje District of southern Malawi, its Malawian heartland. This is close to the Mozambican border over which this group migrated in the course of the last two centuries and across which chiefs Mutharika (whose name Bingu borrowed when he tired of his original name of Brightson Webster Thom), Nasiyaya, Mpeni and Khoromana came for this celebration.

It was attended by the Lhomwe’s most prominent member, President Bingu wa Mutharika, and thus attracted to this small village in the shadow of Mulanje mountain a crowd estimated at 40,000; also a large number of official limousines and military uniforms, a television crew from the state-owned Malawi Broadcasting Corporation, many yards of Mulhako wa Alhomwe cloth, and a host of soft drinks traders to serve the usual thirsts of the country’s hot season.

It was a peaceful and colourful festival which the President insisted, in his opening speech, was “non-political”. “Some critics”, he explained “suggested that I should not come to this function because I am president of this country …. But the Mulhako is non-political. It is about promoting Alhomwe cultural and traditional values including our language” [Daily Times 26/10/09]

It is Malawi’s misfortune that almost everything a president does is political. When its first president, Hastings Kamuzu Banda, shifted the country’s capital-city from Zomba to the heartland of the Chewa people, at Lilongwe in the Central Region, and made their language into the official one of Malawi, it was a political act against the Tumbuka-speakers of the North and the Yao and Ngoni peoples of the south, however justified by the brutal logic of modern state-building.

When Malawi’s second president, Bakili Muluzi, made public appointments from his own Yao people, and was seen to be favouring the Yaos’ Muslim faith over Christian ones, and to be building more roads and power lines in their Mangochi district than elsewhere, he was strongly criticised too.

The fact that post-independence Malawi has escaped large-scale ethnic violence, and is proud of its peaceful and friendly spirit, cannot altogether conceal those bitter ethnic resentments and jealousies that plague other African states and which lie close to Malawi’s surface at all times.

A president’s favour or disfavour can make or break an entire region’s economy, just as they can do for individual careers, and if those favours and disfavours are seen to be based on tribe, then resentments gain political force and coherence.

Suspicions of Bingu’s ethnic favouritism had already surfaced before the Chonde gathering. The arrival there of official limousines containing Lhomwe Cabinet ministers such as Patricia Kaliati, Anna Kachikho, George Chaponda, Richie Muheya, and the President’s own brother and minister of Justice, Peter, was not the only occasion for a counting of Lhomwe heads in Bingu’s government.

Lhomwes at the head of the Anti Corruption Bureau (Alex Nampota), the police service (Peter Mukhito), the Malawi Electoral Commission (Anastasia Msosa); of government-owned corporations such as the Agricultural Development and Marketing Corporation (Charles Matabwa) and the Malawi Social Action Fund (Edward Sawerengera); of Principal Secretaries of major government departments (Joseph Mwanamvekha is the latest on the scene: Chairman of Mulhako wa Alhomwe, and since October, Chief Secretary to the Treasury); the Chief Justice (Lovemore Munlo) and the Attorney-General (Jane Ansah) – all these Lhomwes in high places had been noted with varying degrees of alarm. Nor were the sellers of soft drinks the only businessmen at Chonde to profit by their proximity to greatness.

Leston Mulli, the rapidly rising star of the Malawian business community, with a multitude of blossoming investments in Malawi’s freight and passenger transport, tourism and timber concessions, and in Mulanje District’s large tea estates, was there too as patron of the event. He too is a Lhomwe and the brother of Felton, another of Bingu’s cabinet ministers.

The suspicion of Mutharika’s “tribalism” by members of Malawi’s twenty , or so, other ethnic groups expresses itself in many different ways.

The veteran Sena-speaking political baron of the Lower Shire valley, Gwanda Chakuamba, who was leader of the powerful Mgwirizano Coalition in the 2004 elections, and who now leads the New Republican Party, was recently convicted (but not punished because of his age and growing eccentricity) of incitement to violence against the Lhomwe people.

He told a crowd in November 2008 that the Lhomwe were becoming “cheeky” and deserved to be beaten-up. More significant, perhaps, was the more recent action of Harry Mkandawire, a powerful figure in Malawi’s Northern Region and (until his sacking last month) within the ruling Democratic Progressive Party hierarchy.

His “Open Letter” to the President of 22 October expressed the concerns of Malawi’s northern, largely Chitumbuka-speaking, peoples, who had given Bingu overwhelming support in the recent general election, but who now feel sidelined and ignored by him.

Mkandawire’s particular complaints were directed against the reintroduction of Kamuzu Banda’s old regional quotas for the selection of university students (because northerners were, and are, seen to be over-represented in the student population); and the Southern bias in Bingu’s appointments to government departments and corporations.

He expressed a particular concern about Mulhako wa Alhomwe: “As the President of Malawi, you are expected to … embrace all tribes and their cultures. It is a paradox for you to be looked upon as favouring one tribe which is synonymous with being called a tribalist”.

Malawi’s ethnic and regional politics are, for the time being, balanced by a growing sense of a common, non-violent, Malawian culture. Its tribalism is often expressed in a healthy respect for cultural ties across those political frontiers established by nineteenth-century European colonialists with little knowledge or respect for such things.

It still offers important solidarities and reassuring cultural identities and it allows the presidents of Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia, Tanzania and South Africa to celebrate their common Chewa, Zulu, Lhomwe, Tumbuka, heritages as easily as their own people have always done .

Bingu may be genuinely innocent of deliberate tribalism. His Democratic Progressive Party on the approach to the 2009 elections did well in the Tumbuka-speaking North, the Chewa-speaking Centre and the Sena-speaking South. But he has to be careful to ensure that the legacy he leaves for Malawi in 2014 will be the golden one he anticipates.

He hopes that it will be that of the modern Moses, leading all of his people to the Promised Land of economic and political security. But it could be that of Humpty Dumpty on the wall in the popular nursery-rhyme of another cultural tradition, who carelessly fell off and could not be put together again.

The tribal politics of Kibaki’s Kenya are a grim warning to Malawi of what happens when a president becomes careless with tribal politics. Malawians familiar with Michela Wrong’s “It’s Our Turn to Eat”, are now openly wondering whose turn it will be “to eat” after the Lhomwes of Malawi leave the dining-tablemutharikamu

Email This Post Email This Post

  1. Wonaniizi says:

    ITS ONLY IN BINGU TIME I HAVE LEARNED THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A LHOMWE AND A MALAWIAN. thanks Bingu we are ready kukuthirani makofi as prophet Mbuya had forseen your pride!!!

  2. Nyambi The Mulhakho Hater says:

    we accept that previous regimes also favoured tribes men but they never went as far as this “nsato eating monster”. why should he be at the head of such a tribal grouping? and why should he sink so low and point fingers at other tribal groups that they are dominating the universities? shameless man talking like an ordinary man on the street!

    two things dont make a right, so the first citizien should not copy bad things his predecessors did.

    ife nthawi ya Muluzi kapena ngwazi weniweni, sitimatukwanizana pamitundu ayi. koma uyu ndi amulhakho anzake odya nsatowa ndi kumwera kachasu wa ma ARV, akutigawanitsa! zimenezo ayi!

  3. Onlooker says:

    As far as tribal politics goes, there is only one sleeping giant in Malawi: CHEWA. With the removal of Ntcheu into the Eastern Region Central Region is now virtually a Chewa region i.e. 92% Chewa, 4% Yao, 4% Maseko/Zulu Ngoni, 0.007% Tonga/Mzimba Ngoni(KK &KU respectively).
    The SR is about 35% Chewa/Nyanja. Indeed, Chikwawa could easily fit in the CR! Hate them or love them, Chewas are everywhere. I was shocked when I went somewhere in Blantyre rural to find GULE! Even in Thyolo, the supposed heart of Mlakho.
    Let us all pray that the Chewa consciousness never awakens the way that of Yaos, Lomwes and Tumbukas has.

  4. Formulation policy says:

    No wonder Malawi is still poor even with 45 years of independence.

  5. AMC says:

    Malawi is now a better place with Bingu- Mose wa lero.Iam just doing my copmarisons with his predecessors.
    Unfortunately he can’t please everybody and taking your anger on him will just make you angrier as Bingu is not going argue with fools; he knows what he is doing.

  6. Zengo Muchacha says:

    Herod wa Lero not Mose wa Lero

  7. Now Mwanamvekha in treasury,Parks at RBM,weak finance minister,mukhito at police,nampota at ACB,munlo at justice together with peter mutharika and many more strategic positions.Malawi is still asleep by the time we wake up around 2014 coffers will be empty mulli will courier all the money out of treasury.Action is needed now lets stop making alot of noise its time for action!I cry for my children.

  8. true malawian says:

    dont hide come open and express your views. those people in those positions they have been apointed, they are there on merit not like what bakili used to do . i mean apointing some one without any qualification just because you are a yao. just a remainder it was kamuzu who appointed anastasian msosa and not bingu at all. nthawi yanu ikadzakwana tidzakumvani otherwise be cool and be quite

  9. pachalo says:

    In your article you forgot another Lomwe at Auction holding Ltd the so called Evans Matabwa who is so popus like he is another god at AHL.

  10. noophiya says:

    Your hatred of Bingu is stemming from the quota system of selecting students into public universities.

    Did you see the population census results? The south and centre has almost 12 million people combined against 1.7 million for the north. People from the centre and south are in support of the quota system and if democracy is about the wishes of the majority, then there is no more issue on the quota system. Majority are in favour, PERIOD!!!!!!!!!

    • Tinkha says:

      We saw the sensus results and it is true that the north has 1.7 million against 12 million for the centre and South. But let me ask you if you saw the percentage of children who are currently in school. The north comes first at 33%, Centre and South are at 27% and 27.4% respectively.So it makes sense to use the number of students as opposed to the population in the country.

      • master says:

        tinkha yes it makes sense to use the number of students in school than that of the whole district population as if the whole district sat for MSCE and UNIMA entry exams,education is not like farming.if the whole country only 28% of malawians are currently at school, what is your bingu doing to force the 72% of those not going to school, to realise the importance of school.if northerners find it important about school why should they fail to go to school when people from the south and centre are not going to school themselves, should we blame the north for that?GO to primary , secondary then you can go to university.