Court rules against Mvula, Jumbe in corruption review case

The Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal has ruled that a section in Anti-Corruption Bureau’s (ACB) Corrupt Practices Act (CPA), which Humphrey Mvula and former  Finance Minister Friday Jumbe were challenging and wanted declared unconstitutional, is constitutional.

According to a statement from ACB, on March 24 this year, the Supreme Court in Blantyre ruled against the decision of the Constitutional Court that the subsection was unconstitutional.

The graft-busting body in 2005 took Mvula and Jumbe to court on separate cases and charged them with misuse [abuse of office] contrary to CPA.

The two argued the section in CPA which ACB used to charge them eroded their right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, according to Section 42(2) (f) (iii) of the Constitution.

Mvula: ACB can now prosecute him

Mvula: ACB can now prosecute him

Jumbe:  Lost review case

Jumbe: Lost review case

The two sought judicial review on the constitutionality of the subsection which was heard under High Court Constitutional Cases No.1 and 2 0f 2005.

The Constitutional Court ruling that the subsection was unconstitutional forced ACB, through Attorney General (AG), to file an appeal at the Supreme Court.

In its determination, the Supreme Court held that Section 25 B (3) of the CPA is a justifiable restriction on the right to be presumed innocent and, therefore, valid under the Constitution.

“The judgment, therefore, means that the bureau can continue with the cases against the two,” said ACB in the statement.

Mvula, a chief executive officer at the liquidated Shire Bus Lines, had earlier argued that he was not a public officer and that the company was a private entity as it was registered under the Companies Act.

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :

Please share this Article if you like Email This Post Email This Post

More From Nyasatimes

More From the World

Comments are closed.