Email a copy of 'Kasambara risks struck off from Malawi law list after conviction' to a friend
Loading ... Loading ... Loading ... Loading ... Loading ...
Loading ...
Email a copy of 'Kasambara risks struck off from Malawi law list after conviction' to a friend
Loading ...
Gender and women activist Emma Kaliya has told parents of the girls brutalised by police on Tuesday to take the...
Iwe Maggie mkazi wa Kasambala stop nonsense of posting Mphwiyo’s picture on your facebook profile.Which was why only 5 people commented about it.Umaona ngati anthu akumvera chisoni. Tikuseka kwambiri. It took a wise person to advise you to remove it from your profile. Komabe a Facebook anaziwisidwa timafuna kuti udziwe. Iwe Maggie limba mtima. Take care of the children including the child who is in Mzuzu. Sadyeka anadyeka ndi nyanga zomwe.
justice has been served. these guys really tried to hide everything and it showed that they were pros. but as they say that every sad story has a silver lining. I see the trio failing in the appeal because Judge Mtambo’s judgment showed demerits and merits and connected it very well. Appeal to all please start watching CSI or CSI: NY or Miami, things of this natureare the order of the day.
It was clear from the start that the Judge wanted Kasambala in no matter what……if one has been following this case from the start….You would clearly see that the state lacked evidence to bring down kasambala.People like Mtambo are a disgrace to the judicial system in this country
Asimango nawo kungofuna potchukila. Ralph ife tikumudziwa. He thought he was above the law. Kaya a panga appeal koma wanyabe
O……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………O Its laughable how a person can think himself so smart that he could annihilate all evidence. . . . And I quote, “We knew about it. There was no evidence . . . ” – (6th Paragraph) I wish Ralph had done a PhD in law (after MSc). He would have known that lack of evidence is not the same as proof of innocence. Sadly or luckily (depending on what you want), Mtambo has a PhD and knows it. . . . Ralph would also have known that in such a case as this one (where it’s almost impossible… Read more »
Are you sure criminal casesentertain proof on balance of probability? Which law school did you attend? Then what will civil case(s) involve? Your tutors didn’t do you any good.
Yaa! tell this retard “analyst” the truth he thinks he knows better
O………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….O
Even if one takes no side in this case, one would realise that Mary Kachale and team, failed to present evidence/proof (beyond reasonable doubt) for the trio’s conviction.
. . . And you may wish to know that “Burden of Proof (balance of probabilities in civil case)” and “Burden of Truth (beyond reasonable doubt, in criminal case)” are theories people learn at school, but in real life, the distinction is subtle and almost non-existent. And in legal matters, “Almost” does count.
O…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..O
And it seems you don’t even know the procedure of having a lawyer stricken off the roll. Why don’t you choose to mute then?
There is a laid procedure to have a lawyer removed from the roll. And that process cannot be complete if a disciplinary hearing has not been made.
I am wondering how the discplinary hearing will be conducted without his presence as he will be in incarcaration.
O………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..O I dont think anyone may fail to know the procedure when the procedure is clearly explained in the story. . . . If you cared to see and not just look; or understand and not just read my comment; you would realise that all am doing is fault the procedure, as it provides a fertile breeding ground for bribes and abuse of power. . . . Your writing could have been of use, if you had told us whether or not this is the standard procedure, the world-over. But even if this may be the case, wrong is wrong… Read more »
End of Kasambara, Judge Mtambo well done. What does Simango know. Another useless person like Kasambara. Kasambara mwana wako wu Mzuzu uja avutika.Amuthandiza ndani poti mayi ake is only a Secretary. Moyo ulimbatu.
The guys was a mafia. He deserved it.Kasambala if he were clean would not have any association with the other two criminals. He has to appeal. Remember ‘kicks of a dying horse’. Even a chicken which has its head cut off it ends up kicking you.
Simango, one of the fairest Malawians who doesn’t get involved in tribalism, has seen this as not justice. That is it!
Who is Simango? Where has he practiced law for him to be amazed?
Chimango is an associate of Ralph’s. Remember that stolen laptop incident at Capital Hotel?
Simango, one of the fairest Malawians who doesn’t get involved in tribalism, has seen this as not justice. That is it!
Eve if Mtambo had a vendetta against kasammbara as Kasammbara claimes no one can take it seriously because of Kasammbara’s own behaviour throughout the trial, he named the judge all sorts of names and worse enough threatened to punch him. If you remember very well, I said this before that Kasammbara was handling this case carelessly without considering the consequences. He at many times asked the judge to recuse himself a sign many suspected that he wanted to go on judge shopping a practice he is suspected to have been doing throughout his career as a lawyer. He forgot that… Read more »