One crazy law: Muckraking on Malawi Marriage, Divorce and Family Relations Bill

Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignoranceGeorge Bernard Shaw

 Let us leave the dreary politics aside this week and discuss some matters of the heart.

You see, folks, the Marriage, Divorce and Family Relations Bill – which has just been assented to by President Peter Mutharika – introduces various new concepts in the law relating to family relationships. Some of them do not make sense at all.

The advocates of the bill – now law courtesy of the President’s magic signature – used the marriage age as a tool to persuade, read force, MPs – to pass it. These people, feminists for that is who they are, also used the same minimum age of marriage as a tool to shame the President into assenting to it.

But has the minimum age of marriage been raised or reduced by this new law?

The new law repeals, amongst others, the Marriage Act of 1902 which on the aspect of the marriage the Registrar of Marriages is prevented from issuing a certificate of marriage until he has been satisfied by an affidavit that each of the parties to the intended marriage (not being a widower or widow) is 21 years old, or that if he or she is under that age, the consent by parents or guardians has been obtained in writing.

The new law states in Section 14 that, “subject to Section 22 of the Constitution, two persons of the opposite sex who are both not below the age of 18, and are of sound mind, may enter into marriage with each other.”

Save for the fact that underage marriages would be declared null and void, there is no further penalty if minors marry contrary to the dictates of the new law.

The Constitution does not put any sanction on underage marriages. What the Constitution does is to demand from the State to actively discourage marriages between persons where either of them is under the age of 15. No doubt the law cannot fight underage marriages. It is acknowledged that laws are there to solve social, political, religious and economic problems. But there are some social issues which the law would be ill-equipped to deal with. Such issues can best be resolved using social means and the age of marriage is just one of them.

The law would only put aspirations on what the minimum age of marriages should be. The measures that the State should put in place include providing the vulnerable members of the community with all the amenities of life including decent education facilities which would keep children in schools.

The new law, in Section 13, introduces the concept of “marriage by repute and permanent co-habitation”, a concept which customary law and statutory law did not recognise although the Constitution just mentions it. Persons of the opposite sex who have never undergone any process of celebration of marriage can be said to be married if they live together for a period exceeding five years.

The new law has also brought changes the manner in which a spouse would acquire interest in a property acquired in the course of the marriage. Under the old law the mere fact of marriage did not entitle a spouse to acquire interest in property acquired by one of the spouses in the course of the marriage relationship. Under the old law, for example, when one spouse does the odd jobs about construction of a house which plainly belongs to the other – the ‘do-it-yourself’ things – he or she does not thereby become entitled to an interest in it. The spouse needed to show direct or indirect contribution towards the acquisition of the house.

The new law does not require showing direct or indirect contribution towards the acquisition of the property. What this means is that any property acquired by any of the spouses becomes, under the new law, joint property. A spouse would not dispose of any of their property whether by sale, will or gift without the consent of their spouses. In effect the new law effectively nullifies the need to make Wills.

Some sections of the new law are outright funny, if not crazy. For example, Section 92 of the Marriage, Divorce and Family Relations Bill provides for the right of a spouse to apply for permanent maintenance even in divorce. How crazy is that!

It gets funnier when minors make each other pregnant. The new law, in Section 96(2), requires the parents or guardian of the male minor to maintain the pregnancy and to pay for or reimburse the attendance costs of delivery.

Curiously, the new law does not provide for any corresponding responsibility on the parents of the female minor! Is this a case of guilt by association?

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :

Please share this Article if you like Email This Post Email This Post

More From the World

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
bingiza off road

amama kanthu ako (permanent maintanance even in divorce)add this clause please (permanent fucking even in divorce. #2015parliamentarymadness.

happy nyirenda

zopusa! mwatopa nzeru zayamba kutha eti.


stupidity reigns again in the stupid government

Jah Vier

One man for one woman, you will be saved from this confusing law……….be faithful to your spouses basi……otherwise mulimana dzuwa likuwala!


Baboons in Parliament don’t even read bills before passing them into law…’s a sad development. Some even sleep during debate……why should a president of sound mind consent to such nonsense………..we will be building houses in our relatives names and in utter secrecy…….. tikumana kunseu komweko


Mahule asangalale, madolo ogwila ntchito azidandaula. Sings of the end of times, Ambuye bwelani muzaononge dzikoli ndikuzakhazikisa Ufumu wanu.

Future Watcher

People of God! When such things happen, do not be surprised. Its signs of times. Now marriages will be a confusion. It is devil now targeting families and that’s the end. Those with prophetic eyes like mine can understand what I mean. If families are confused with more of the powers surrendered to Women, would there be peace? Behold!!! Its time to repent and pray hard for our Nation. Mind you, the devil is working right within us.. He touches every angle. He knows what can lead to what, to achieve his aim..Open your eyes,

Vimbuza Masekese

Zoona mkazi woti akukweredwa ndi munthu wina azibwera kwa ine kudzatenga ya Shubaba?

bingiza off road

tiziona a prostitute drafted this law passed by zitsiru aserted by mad lawyer cum president who cant interprete it.


I partly don’t support it. what about step families? if you say a woman should get everything acquired even if she does not contribute to acquiring it, wouldn’t the woman’s step children suffer?

These so called new marriage laws doesnt make sense to me at all. What about if the man was once married and divorced bfr these so called new laws and has children frm his previous wife and in his mind he is building an empire for his kids from the previous marriage knowing its hard for them to acquire any property if he passes on cos all property will be with his new wife which will inturn insurbodinate the husbands kids from the previous marriage and favour hers even though the passed on man was not the father!!! can some… Read more »

More From Nyasatimes