The dollar sign joke: Muckraking on Malawi Pres. Mutharika’s assets ‘correction’

“It’s not what you look at that matters; it’s what you see” -Henry David Thoreau

So how much is Peter Mutharika worth? Is it US $8.2 million or US $2 million?

President Mutharika

President Mutharika

Christopher Tukula, the Assets Director, came back to correct the figures his own office released and told us our president is actually not yet a kwacha billionaire.

I do not think we should allow Tukula to get away with murder. Surely he should not get away with just explaining that his office mis-read the dollar sign.

Really? No, Chris, no, we deserve better than that; we must be a joke of a nation to accept such tosh.

Look, Tukula should have realised that he was handling very sensitive information. He must have known that, with the recent revelations that some people were playing Monopoly with our taxes, what was in the declaration forms of public officers’ assets was of utmost importance.

As a journalist I would be the last to advocate for the withholding of information but I will also be the last to entertain half-baked information.

Why was the Assets chief rushing into releasing information he had not yet verified? He claims that the mistake came about because State House delivered the President’s declaration forms in hand-written form.

Well, he may not be a hand-writing expert but surely one must be high on something not exactly legal to mistake the dollar ($) sign with the figure eight (8). Let us imagine the President indicated the money in his US account was US $2 million. Maybe he is not familiar with the dollar symbol but surely Tukula is intelligent enough to understand that ‘US’ stands for United States. US8 million should surely have left him askance.

Or maybe the form just indicated $2 million without the ‘US’ prefixed. How could he just assume the money was dominated in US dollars and not any other currency?

And where did he get the point to denote US $8.2 million? Why did he not quote the figure as US $82 million if indeed he mistook the dollar sign as the figure 8? It just does not add up.

And this was not the only mistake on the President’s forms. There was one vehicle, a Merc, which the Assets Directorate said it cost Peter US $25,000,000. C’mon, good people, what was the man who would be our president in the US again? Some Madonna or Tom Cruise? Was the Merc an armoured one or a jet?

These, by the way, could have been honest mistakes to be fair to Tukula. But why was this excitement in releasing unverified raw data? I thought his office’s role is to collect information on various public officers’ assets, synthesise, scrutinise and verify such information?

Surely such amazing figures should have raised some eye-brows. If it was State House or his office that made these mistakes that should have been cleared before making the information public. After all Tukula himself told us some public officers did not understand the declaration forms and that he would send the forms back for them to fill them properly.

So what was the rush in releasing some public officers’ data when his office was still computing others? What if my interest was not on the President, the Vice President, the former president or the Leader of Opposition? What if my interest was on some obscure MP who did not understand the forms? Would it have made any sense for Tukula to tell me that that MP was still correcting his forms when some officers’ details were already in the public arena?

Tukula may argue that it was the media and other interested parties that requested the information. That is correct. But people were looking for correct information. He would not have been committing any crime had he politely and honestly told them his office was still scrutinising the information.

(By the way, by ‘correct’ information I mean as those declaring such information intended them to read. For some reason some public officers could have inflated or under-declared their assets. That, I think, is the proper reading of the term ‘raw’ information. Tukula’s job is to verify whether such ‘raw’ information is reflective of the true picture. Releasing such ‘raw’ but ‘correct’ information to the public may help him ascertain this.)

I hope Tukula realises that his premature release of the wrong data has informed a wrong national narrative. For starters, the President’s apologists already leapt to his defence, saying it was not strange for a professor teaching in the United States for 40 years to accumulate US $8.2 million. And yet his detractors were speculating that Peter deliberately inflated his wealth so that if he steals from government nobody should question if he suddenly becomes fabulously rich.

And yet another school of thought was of the view that State House realised that US $8.2 million was an unbelievable figure for a college professor, be they teaching in Zomba or Washington, and twisted Tukula’s arm to admit the computing faux pas to save the President’s face.

All these narratives do not do the President’s image any good at all.

By the way, with such ‘expensive’ mistakes on information of so important a personage, how do we begin to trust information on the declared assets of the other lowly public officers? How do we begin to have faith in an office so important that can make mistakes so careless?

No, Tukula’s explanation is as empty as it does not make sense. He must apologise to the President and the entire nation for releasing wrong data. And if we were a serious nation we should have been demanding his immediate resignation before he makes further ‘expensive’ mistakes.

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :

Please share this Article if you like Email This Post Email This Post

More From the World

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Ku mwanza cha pa mphete
Guest

Good show tenthani. Thz muthalikaz amafuna adzitibela in the name of kuphunzira kwambiri. Only genius can understand what tenthan is tryng to unfold here. Mr presdent, we need our leave grants as soon as posible.

omwale
Guest

Zamkutu,the guy z incomptent

Mngoni
Guest
Lemme start with you poor dunderhead calling yourself attorney general, I find your reasoning and logic very retrogressive and archaic, you are the guys failing Malawi. If the country continue inhabiting poor minds like yours I guess, no hope for the rise of Malawi. Tell me if its an oath so does it mean the asserts director is not supposed to make further examination if the data/information he is revealing to the general public is true or false? If you do not have any ideas it is better for you to stay quiet rather than making some unnecessary noise just… Read more »
KARU UNITED
Guest

Either the office bearer, of the office of the Director of Assets declarations is also crooked or extremely naive.Is he not the same person who brushed shoulders with the ACB,for allegedly misleading his clients? As country,i wish we had more men of integrity like:Roosevelt Gondwe, Hon.Dunstan Mwaungulu or the No nonsense resident magistrate Viva Nyimba,Gustave Kaliwo or Meyer Chisanga,or the job should have gone to a chartered accountant,like the new kid on the block LUCAS KONDOWE,Lucas for president 2019!

Arrows
Guest

Walephera ncthito Tukulayo ayitule pansi basi

attorney general
Guest
Wait a minute Mr Dumb Muckraker? Have you read the Asset Declaration Act yourself before coming into this public space to advise the Assets Office on how they should do their job?Do you know that the declarations are an oath?Officers made these declarations under oath.What does an oath mean?What do you mean the assets office should release raw but correct information? The office is there to release the information which the officer himself declared under oath.What is the point of the oath then if the declaration is subject to another scrutiny and correction before being released? Don’t confuse people.Previously what… Read more »
M23
Guest
Who is dumb here, the Muckraker or the self proclaimed Attorney General? When you make a declaration under oath all you are saying is that the information provided according to your knowledge is true. Should it later transpire that you lied you could be prosecuted. It is for this reason that Assets Declarations Office should make sure that the information released to the public is exactly what was declared by the public officer in question. Should the information prove incorrect, let the blame be on the public officer and not the office of assets declarations. I as well do not… Read more »
auditor
Guest

Point of Order Mr Tenthani:They said they are releasing the information just as raw as officers declared it to the declaration office so that if there are any inconsistencies people may report them.Verification will follow later.If they have to verify before releasing this info when will the verification end for all the declared assets.A Tenthani osamangonamiza wanthu apa.

Concerned citizen
Guest

but guys what about a decimal point.is it possible to have a decimal point just after a dollar sign.This Tukula thing saw a decimal point somewhere.

Kasparov
Guest

The two most important days in your life are the day you were born and the day you realise why. Tenthani was born to rescue hapless malawians. Don’t attempt to do anything to bring him down. That will be mission impossible, because God is watching your every move.

Yosefe Gambatula
Guest

This self imposed man should simply resign to save his face.Malawi has totally lost trust in him apart from his stooge loyalist Ben Phiri and his Lomwe cohorts surrounding him.Mbendera anatibweletsera mavuto kwabasi pa Malawi.We never voted for this thief.

wpDiscuz

More From Nyasatimes