Defence lawyer queries Airtel Malawi testimony: Mphwiyo case - Malawi Nyasa Times

Email a copy of 'Defence lawyer queries Airtel Malawi testimony: Mphwiyo case' to a friend

Loading ...

58 Comments

newest

oldest most voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

guarantor

9 years ago

Even towers overlap but each tower segment has unique ID that pricesly identifies a specific tower. This is what determines where the person was. No where to hide

kwaya uwotche

9 years ago

Imphwiyo saw him at the gate b4 he was shot and call log captured his call from area 43 airtel tower,he was in area 43 and this wa less than 1 hr b4 shooting incident.

kwaya uwotche

9 years ago

Why should the suspects’ phone call be captured in area 43 airtel tower ? Area 43 where mphwiyo was shot.area 43 where mphwiyoswa

Mbanangwa

9 years ago

Radius and overlapping transmissions are equivocal hence prove neither way. It is immaterial evidence.

Wizeman Paul

9 years ago

If they are not believing the call logs, just tell them to call each other and then print the latest call logs for them to compare. May be they can believe that this call logs are genuine.

vuto

9 years ago

Chikoya mbuzi ya munthu ukakhala umapita ku court sukadanena zimenezo. Government has goofed big time.

vuto

9 years ago

A big man amenewo ndiye maloto a chumba. Going to jail we you as one of state witnesses have failed to produce evidence?

chikoya

9 years ago

Defence thought that prosecutors will fail to prove that kumwembe was not outside malawi and case wil close but alas, they r in for a big shock. Towers can overlap but a phone uses only the strongest tower signal according to where a caller is. so, if the log shows that kumwembe phone was using a tower where mphwiyo’s house is located, it is obvious he was in that area at that time. the issue of the fon being with a wife is laughable, it shows defence r now cornered to prove that kumwembe was outside malawi when infact he… Read more »