Malawi groups protest  shortage of drugs,  Aids Commission grants

Malawi human rights campaigners  have said they will still protests to secure a refund of K5 million (about $10 000) that the National Aids Commission (NAC) spent during the launch of the Beautify Malawi (Beam) Trust launch and have also voiced out the shortage of essential drugs  and collapse of heath service delivery system.

Kumbweza Banda: NAC do not expect a refund of K5 million from Mutharika’s Beam

Kumbweza Banda: NAC do not expect a refund of K5 million from Mutharika’s Beam

A leaked documents had shown that organisers of demonstrations are on the list of receipients of the 54 grants worth K4.9 billion (about $9.8m) which NAC approved at a meeting held on Friday, January 1 2014 .

NAC board chairperson, Mara Kum’bweza Banda, confirmed the documents as authentic, saying Cedep, Manet+, JBFI and State Residences are among the organisations whose applications for grants were approved, authenticating the figures as K44 863 192. 64;  K113 873 064.50; K73 593 400.00 and K49 790 605.76 respectively.

This prompted trustee of Beam, Mavuto Bamusi to attack organisers of the demonstrations as hypocrites.

Kumbweza Banda said NAC approves grants from an applicant if they are legally registered organisations, have functional governance structures, have capacity in all key grant management and programme implementation functions.

Cedep boss Gift Trapence said the organisation received  the funding because they have “a component relating to HIV and Aids” and that they followed the procedure and probed whether Beam and was eligible under those criteria.

He said the dilemma that Malawi finds itself in is that the impression created by NAC might jeopardize Malawi’s application for sustaining funding from the Global Fund for HIV/AIDS.

“ This situation further puts to question the commitment of the current leadership [government and NAC] in promoting fiscal discipline in use of these resources. Loss of funding to interventions on HIV/Aids would put at high risk the lives of patients who are dependent on such funds for their treatment,” reads the statement.

According to NAC chairperson, the national response to HIV and Aids is multi-sectoral since the epidemic has not spared any sector as such, organisations from the public, private, faith, civil society, research and academia sectors are eligible to apply as long as they satisfy the stipulated criteria and funds are available.

Kum’bweza Banda said the Global Fund (GF) and other donors that finance NAC do not expect a refund of K5 million from Mutharika’s Beam because they are “satisfied” with their explaination.

But CSOs argue that whilst the country is still facing shortages of ARVs, it is surprising to note that resources for such a purpose have been misdirected to entities that do not directly deal with HIV/ AIDS interventions such as BEAM Trust and Mulhako wa Alomwe calling it  “tantamount to abuse of resources. “

The groups stated: “Malawians are disappointed that the process of granting funds to the stated recipients was not fair thorough, and in the best interest of Malawians. In fact, Malawians are aware that many NGOs/CBOs/FBO earmarked for funding were not granted funds on grounds that funds were not available which gives the impression that, the granting of resources to the stated recipients was political manipulation.”

According to the CSO’s,  Malawians are also concerned with acute shortage of essential drugs, and the continued collapse of the health service delivery system.

“Malawians also deplore the unbearable working conditions of health personnel where in some instances they are compelled to work at the expense of their own lives and this has demotivated the workers in the sector.”

The CSOs said since BEAM, Mulhakho Wa Alhomwe are unwilling to account, refund and resolve the NAC issue, the planned nationwide demonstration will proceed on 13th January.

Speaking during the news conference, CSOs coordinating spokesperson Timothy Mtambo indicated that they were following all the procedures required to hold the demo.

“We can assure the nation that following the failure of the institutions in question to meet our demands over NACGATE, the demonstrations are still on 13th January 2015. As earlier communicated, apart from NACGATE concerns and demands, these demonstrations shall also provide the platform for the citizens to express other the prevailing governance, economic, and human rights concerns including some of those aired out during the press briefing.

“It’s all about the best interest of the nation. Government-orchestrated propaganda levelled against human rights defenders will take the country nowhere, and must stop,”said the outspoken Mtambo.

CSOs and activists party to the statement  are Malawi Health Equity Network (MHEN), Centre for Human Rights and Rehabilitation (CHRR), Centre for Development of People (Cedep), Nurses Organisation of Malawi, Malawi Network of Religious Leaders Living with HIV and AIDS (MANERELA), Civic and Political Space (CPS), Church and Society Programme-Livingstonia Synod(CSP-LS), Human Rights Defenders Forum (HRDF), Malawi Human Rights Resource Centre (MHRRC), Malawi Network of People Living with HIV and AIDS,  Citizen for Justice (CFJ), Benedicto Kondowe (In his capacity as a Human Rights defender), Hebrews Misomali (Human Rights defender), National Elections Trust,.

Others are ANPPCAN Malawi Chapter, Family Planning Association of Malawi, Local NGO Forum on HIV/AIDS, Foundation for Community Support Services, Youth and Society, Child Development and Support Organisation, Centre for Youth Development, and Outreach Scout Foundation are the.


Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :

Please share this Article if you like Email This Post Email This Post

More From the World

29 thoughts on “Malawi groups protest  shortage of drugs,  Aids Commission grants”

  1. Kanyimbi says:

    Akukangana chifukwa wina wasusa zambiri. Zopusa basi muzapita nokha ku ma DEMO kwanuko ine ayi ndizakhala ndili ku munda. MUkutiona ngati a Malawi ndife ogona? Dikilani muzawona demo yeni yeni osati zopusa zanuzi ayi.

  2. Kwangwagwa says:

    Amene mukumanenana za mitundu inu mungotaya nthawi yani pachabe chifukwa tonse ndife a Malawi. Palibe amene angachite claim kuti iye ndiye malawi weniweni. Talk about issues and not castigating each other basing on tribes or regions or languages.

  3. Kwangwagwa says:

    Matenda a edzi awa avuta. Mpaka Beam kulandila ndalama za edzi?

  4. vimbundi says:

    Tumbukas are not Malawians that’s why they rejoice in Malawian disorders and destruction. When JB messed around, ife amitundu ina only offered advice and waited for her to change which she did not. So we voted her out..but we did not advocate destruction of this country because we know this is our home. Atumbuka tidzakuthamangitsani tsiku lina mukapitiliza zibwana!

  5. Gum says:

    It’s your right to demonstrate. But I have the right not to demonstrate too. Go to the streets and let’s who will be fooling who. Its not the Malawi of two years ago.

  6. Honourable says:

    Tiyeni nazoni! Mlakho wa Alomwe and Beam plus NAC should demonstrate how their programs were relevant to HIV and AIDS interventions. Full stop. It is not a matter of who received in the past. The fact that organisation x received funding is no justification for careless disbursement of public funds. Two wrongs are not equal to a right.

  7. nabanda says:

    Shame on u kum’bweza banda

  8. kamps says:

    only fools will demonstrate

  9. Nnandi says:

    No need to call for Demos here. These so called CSOs just need attention. Its their way of begging from those in power. Let us all shun their demos and see what they will do. Remember, two wrongs cant make a right. Who will cover the cost of distruction if these demos turn violent? Let us give dialogue a chance if we are really serious. Its only a fool that rushes to the street, a wiseman reasons…..

  10. Nyani wa ku Mwananyani says:

    From all the evidence, it appears the promoters of the demonstration have a hidden agenda. Their rationale is dubious, especially when we look at NAC’s funding in the past: some of these same NGO’s promoting the demo were recipients of funds from the same NAC (this is well documented). Self serving NGO’s. They are so inconsistent, no wonder many Malawians consider them irrelevant.
    Their foreign funders need to seriously examine these groups. Not just their governance, but their overall effectiveness; and where they fit in Malawi’s democracy, and fairness (read employment). NGOs should not be considered PERSONAL property, or fiefdoms! Some of them even, blatantly and unashamedly, run against the interest of our country, at large. Why?
    The number of NGOs needs to be thinned out, weeded out, like they have just done in Kenya. Asa!

  11. Phiri says:

    Tsono apa tiziti anyani kusekana dzikundu, mabungwe amene akupita ku nseu kusonyeza kukwiya ndi Beam nawonso amadyanso ndarama za NAC ndiye wachilungamo ndi ndani, kodi titati accountability ya ndarama mudalandira kuchokera mu funding ya pa 14 January 2014 mutionetsa anthu amene idawapindulira Kodi? Kapena ndi anthu ongokuzungulirani adadya nawo ndarama ngati sizidapindulire a Malawi ofunika thandixo la NAC mukwanitsa kuzibweza ndaramaxo Kodi? Apo ai Kalondolondo wa ndarama za NAC achitike pasafike pa 13 January 2015, chilungamo chidziwe basi.

  12. Namihavani says:

    I understand MWA and BEAM are becoming too defensinve on this issues mwina apond mwala peneapake and its sad that MBC is also heavily spearheading the division as a public broadcaster

  13. Human rights defenders ?…when it suits you…we need human rights defenders that defend rights even within their organizations…the problem with our country is not just macro management but also these small organizations also abuse donor funds as small as they are….we also need consistent defenders of our rights and not people that defend when it suits them….NAC gate is a very unfortunate scenario in our small country…BEAM must show remorse together with NAC…unfortunately Govt of the day is always right

  14. Ma says:

    Kuli ma allowance Ku NAC? Akumanga nawo mantumba athu joma inu?

  15. Nkhombokombo says:

    NAC has a Commitee which decides on which applicant should have the money which they ask for and most likely they present the ir cash flow and here the MWA claims that they didn’t get cash from NAC but only received Services, should mean that the services they got from NAC were non-payable services which did not need money? The case here is that money was spent on somethings which are not directly related NAC official services, ie the transportation, buying food and accommodation to the participants of MWA. This a sectral gathering which the Lomwes celebrate and promote their culture and most obvious the HIV and AIDS programmes are not featured. Lets be fair here, don’t alter the AGENDA of the good cause of the Grouping. Politics should not interfere here, you the called Reps of MWA should be careful with what you utter for the good of the GROUPING!!

  16. amuje says:

    Is this the same Bamusi. Money corrrupts the mind indeed

  17. moniredada says:

    NAC has been disbursing funds since it was established! Just because they took part in the launch of BEAM(not in cash)is not enough reason why peoples properties should be vandalized on 13th! The two women activists who r advocating for the demonstrations, Dorothy Ngoma and Martha Kwataine r in constant contact with Joisi Banda. The two r bitter because Dorothy is no longer being treated as a PS and the Prado was withdrawn and Martha Kwataine is no longer getting the mileage claims she was getting from MACRA for her numerous trips from Lilongwe to Blantyre even though she was using a MEHN vehicle(ACB investigate)_. Musavulalitse anthu amene muti mukawatenge mu ma truck kuzayenda ku ma demo!

  18. Joyce Bunda says:

    Kodi iwe mara kumbweza banda ndiwe mbuzi chonchi?

    1. powder says:

      maiyu walongosola momveka bwino hiv sikusankha so iwonso sakusankha maperekedwe a ndalama provided proposal yanu ipange convince committe yopanga approve. its straight here! the problem mukufuna pogwetsera boma, but apa nzosamveka. ngakhale mutero hmukuzichotsera mileage. and anthu akuona kuti ndinu anjiru! mabungwe aniuwo adatengua ndalama zambirio muululitsa oliizambiriuuuuu, siiklo

  19. aphiri says:

    Nanga mpaka NAC money was used to provide transport for lomwe chiefs and their food

  20. mlongoti says:

    the truth is that the money would have been put to a better use.

  21. dyabulosi says:

    Kodi atumbuka inu kudzikonda bwanji?

  22. dreamteam says:

    If you were to make BEAM pay money back, many other organizations would have to pay back the money – there so many organizations including the private sector who are benefiting from the NAC resources.

    The people we need to hold accountable here are not from BEAM but from the NAC itself. We should demand that they release a list of organizations that have benefited and how funds were given to them. Otherwise we will have this happening again

  23. Namalila says:

    What’s wrong for NAC to simply apologise and accept a refund realised by the well wishers.
    Surely, they may lose nothing. Dzuka Malawi , Dzuka! And let us all build our country together . The country belongs to all of us and let us be passionate about it!



  25. Marioshona man says:

    Your demo will yield nothing. Thus wastage of resOurces

  26. brutsha says:

    A Mabvuto Bamusi do not surrender voice of reason simply because of kaudindo komwe anakupatsani. NAC has rigorous laid procedures for an organizations to access it’s funds and so many organizations of good will fail to meet these conditions . I don’t think BEAM or whatever unsustainable you call it met the criteria. Komanso the chairperson of NAC and pint sized Mabvuto Bamusi should not give an impression that they are happy with competition for insanity in the way public resources are plundered in Malawi. Right framed minded people in Malawi are always looking for a day when sanity will prevail in the way public affairs are run in Malawi especially with change of leadership. We are fed up with mediocrity in Malawi.

  27. Mike Ndau says:


  28. mjiba says:

    NAC should be probed seriously inu a ACB WAKE UP see how these people running NAC have amassed wealth PROBE THEM BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE the way they are disbursing funds indicates a lot of fraud get on them you toothless dogs ACB

Comments are closed.

More From Nyasatimes