Critical Appraisal of the IPOR 2025 Pre-Election Survey: Coincidence or Constructed Optics?

Just days after Malawi’s campaign season roared to life, the Institute of Public Opinion and Research (IPOR) dropped a political bombshell: the DPP is surging, UTM is crumbling, and MCP’s Central Region fortress is slipping. But is this a reflection of reality—or an attempt to manufacture it?

Too Perfect to Be Coincidence

The timing is uncanny.

Barely a week after the DPP sent shockwaves across the country by naming Jane Ansah as Peter Mutharika’s running mate—a move widely ridiculed—the party miraculously emerges as the projected national frontrunner at 43%. Even more eyebrow-raising: it’s pegged at 37% in the North, a region where it has historically gasped for relevance.

Meanwhile, UTM—still loud, visible, and active across the country—is mysteriously crushed to a mere 5%, a far cry from the 20% it polled in 2019. MCP, long a Central Region juggernaut with nearly 70% support, is now—without explanation—reported at just 49%. There’s no deep dive, no context, no nuance.

The numbers read less like a snapshot of voter sentiment, and more like a script.

Data Holes and Dodgy Distributions

A credible poll thrives on clarity and detail. This one? Not so much.

  • No full regional breakdown by candidate is published.
  • Smaller parties and independents are erased into a vague “others” category.
  • The Southern Region is suspiciously expanded to include Eastern Malawi—historically a UDF heartland—with no explanation of how subregional dynamics were factored in.

For a survey that claims methodological strength, these omissions are telling.

History Ignored, Trends Abandoned

Electoral history in Malawi isn’t guesswork—it’s well documented. But this survey seems to rewrite that history at will.

  • The Central Region shows a steep MCP drop, but with no clear beneficiary.
  • The Southern Region looks magically unified despite active fragmentation and tribal diversity.
  • And in the North, a historically weak DPP is suddenly performing miracles—without a shred of narrative to explain how or why.

In polling, if it doesn’t make sense, it probably doesn’t add up.

Narrative by Design?

Sometimes, what isn’t said is more powerful than what is.

  • The poll spotlights front-runners but silences others.
  • It downplays traditional strongholds without evidence of erosion.
  • And perhaps most damning: it omits core methodological info—no sampling method, no treatment of undecided voters, no weighting approach.

This feels less like data and more like deliberate perception engineering.

Verdict: Not So Fast

Until IPOR releases full disaggregated data, clarifies its methodology, and justifies these suspicious deviations from past trends, its 2025 pre-election survey should be taken not as gospel, but as strategy—a political tool, expertly timed, and dangerously persuasive.

In a democracy, opinion polls can inform. But when they obscure more than they reveal, it’s not democracy they serve—it’s agenda.

 

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :

Sharing is caring!

Follow us in Twitter
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Read previous post:
OPINION | Why Mumba is the Right Choice for Chakwera to Avoid Re-run

Your Excellency, Dr. Lazarus McCarthy Chakwera, In politics, timing is everything. So is perception. So is coalition-building. And as you...

Close