Donors’ trust in Malawi government financial system low—Report

Malawi’s development partners have low trust in the Public Finance Management systems and  the country’s procurement systems at the moment, a Mid-Term Review of the Malawi Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS) III has revealed.

Munthali: Need for greater use of  public capital market financing 

However, with the on the ongoing revived public sector reforms being led by State vice-president Saulos Chilima, the Tonse alliance led  administration has embarked on  actions to tackle corruption and for greater efficiency and effectiveness in the public sector which will possibly unlock aid support.

National Planning Commission (NPC),  director general Thomas Chataghalala Munthali,  whose organisation  had made the  analysis to consider on MGDS  III  pointed out that there is need for greater use of  “public capital market financing for infrastructure projects, including public private partnerships.”

He said the country has not developed significantly because of over-reliance on donors whom he said have different interests than the country’s development priorities.

The five-year MGDS III runs from 2017 to 2022.

Last year, Roy Stewart, a Conservative Party legislator was quoted by  The Times of London as having said that Malawi’s state of impoverishment has worsened despite it getting £4.5 billion (about K4.5 trillion) from Britain in form of aid for the past 50 years.

Malawi has been operating without budget support from its development partners since 2013 when donors withheld their funding following revelations of the plunder of public resources at Capital Hill which British forensic auditors,  RSM  (formerly Baker Tilly), established to be K24 billion between April and September 2013.

Further eroding confidence in government systems is the PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) report from the examination of public finances from January 1 2009 to December 31 2014 released roughly three weeks ago, which found that at least K577 billion—around 30 percent of total expenditure during the five-year period—was not accounted for.

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :
Follow us in Twitter

7 replies on “Donors’ trust in Malawi government financial system low—Report”

  1. Bottom-line is the calibre there is meant to handle finances now makes the rest of the world to become sceptical. Instead of running government you are busy with trivialities. Those donors want to hear from you as government the mechanism you have put in place on how to generate funds for government maintenance. Public reform and fulfillment of empty campaign rhetoric on their own will not provide you with the means. Kaya, muona kuti mupanga bwanji.

  2. This is same old nonsense from the so called western donors.They have been singing this since the colonial times hence the need for Malawi to wean themselves from them. Even the report says Malawi has not had budgetory support from them since 2013. They like to protray themselves as good samaritans but really what they are interested in is their own interests. Take for example Britain where they had a minister called Chris Grayling. He was so incompetent and gave contracts to companies that have never even conducted business in contracts he was awarding all because they have links or connections to the conservative party. A ruthless organisation that maintaining power is a must Where was the outcry about honest and open public procurement. France and its banking system continues to rip off west african nations whose financial transactions have to pass through France to get any legitimacy, a legacy of colonial times. Everytime there is an economic crisis they demand poor countries devalue their currencies. why. So they buy raw materials and commodities at rock bottom prices. When have you ever heard of any western nation devaluing their currency? When have yiu ever heard them talking down their nations many of which are corrupt and failing. It is because confidence boosts economies. Talking down and calling others third world, poor, makes them feel better and superior. Again a legacy from old colonial thinking.
    If it wasnt because of our short term thinking clown politicians who like to steal we would be far and would not need lectureres from the so called donors. Their involvement in Malawi and africa only benefits them as they are in control. We need to take ownership of decision making and not listen to them. listen only if it is beneficial to us.

  3. Malawi needs good monitoring system like pre check by internal audit, audit by independent NAO, not NAO as it is, not funded, political, and I’ll motivated. There is a need to make ACB apolitical, well trained and real invsetigators. Not taking teachers as investigators thus why mk1.7 bn case has taken over 25 years.

Comments are closed.