Malawians question ESCOM’s and LWB’s MK5.9bn finances for Kenyatta Drive expansion project

Scores of Malawians have taken to social media, questioning why Electricity Supply Corporation of Malawi (ESCOM) and Lilongwe Water Board need (LWB) close to MK5.9 billion in order to execute their roles in the Kenyatta Drive six-lane expansion project.

The citizens also accuse the two utility bodies and the Roads Authority (RA) of “poor coordination and planning” in the project.

ESCOM is addressing the issues

Malawians’ anger comes after the local media reported that ESCOM and LWB require close to MK5.9 billion to enable the relocation of transmission lines, distribution lines and poles that are close to the road project.

ESCOM reportedly needs MK2 billion to buy materials and MK40 million to do the works while LWB is looking for MK3.9 billion to accommodate the MK19 billion six-lane project.

The situation reportedly explains, in part, why works on the road project have stalled “with no equipment on sight”.

And some Malawians on social media have launched a scathing attack on Escom and LWB, wondering why the two institutions are raising their issues now, long after the feasibility study was done and President Lazarus Chakwera laid the foundation stone for construction of the six lane.

“It goes back to proper planning and proper coordination by these entities in execution of such projects. Otherwise, we will have similar situations in all our cities and towns when carrying out road expansion programs in future,” Moses Kita says.

Winfred Brave Kayange suspects institutionalized corruption and sabotage by “ambassadors of the opposition” in ESCOM and LWB.

Marshal Madise says, “We joke too much. All that time before embarking on this big project, these institutions did not put that into consideration?”

“I guess there was no feasibility study before the project was approved. Anyway, let me focus on the flames for now,” Kondwani Ngalawango says.

Sheria Annie says, “Why on Earth is this coming out now? Were these entities not involved in the feasibility study? If only the public procurement system was good enough to handle this without inflated costs.”

“Who was doing the feasibility study? Was he paid or not? We demand to see a report of the feasibility study to see its effectiveness. Otherwise before embarking on the project, the entities should have known their roles and challenges and already planned how to handle them. Mwatizizimutsatu apa( you have taken us unawares). We feel you have just created a way to syphon our tax,” says Temwa Mkandawire.

ESCOM spokesperson Innocent Chitosi is reported to have said that the issue of the MK2 billion will be referred to the company’s board for guidance, as RA believes “such costs ought to be incurred by ESCOM.”

On the other hand, LWB spokesperson, Chisomo Chibwana, reportedly said the government’s treasury is aware of the company’s request for funds with regard to the Kenyatta Drive six-lane expansion project.

Treasury spokesperson Williams Banda reportedly said the treasury is looking into the matter and will make a communication at “an appropriate time”.

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :
Follow us in Twitter

7 replies on “Malawians question ESCOM’s and LWB’s MK5.9bn finances for Kenyatta Drive expansion project”

  1. Malawians are fond of questioning everything without knowing what it takes to re-locate water pipes or power lines. There shall be man power to work overtime, to buy new poles, spindles, wires, to excavate trenches, pipes, flanges, gate valves, excavation of holes and so may activities which will take place on this stretch. To have way leave ESCOM and LWB will also need to pay for the land they will encroach. With just a few activities I have mentioned of which I have i have forgotten some, but how much do you think ESCOM and BWB will spend in order to execute this job against time? Or else you all who are arguing come in and do the job with your estimates you think.

  2. The Roads Act says road reserve should be 30 meters from the middle of the raod both sides.
    This means if Escom and Water Boards had laid their lines and and pipes within the 30 meters distance from middle of the road both utility bodies acted against the law.
    Therefore both bodies must be punished and bear their own cost for removing the lines and pipes from the road reserve.

  3. ESCOM sacks big time. You pay each other allowances you didn’t work for, all year round…. sometimes deliberately create problems as opportunities to make more allowances.

    I think they have alot of money on them. This reported amount should never never ever come from GOVT. Do a self sponsorship on this one. I challenge they can!!

  4. A Malawi mwafika pauchitsiru ndithu this is a big project and its in town ndipo it’s not easy to carry out such issues

  5. Road reserve encroachment has a cost. We plan very bad for any development. Water pipo think if water flows then they have done their work hence these costs. Building construction in road reserve is another aspect for pipo to be very careful of too

  6. When politics decide on construction projects thiscis what happens. The designs on the ground for past 2 years were for 4 lanes road but suddenly on political podium someone decides to make it 6 lanes in order to make it his Administration’s flagship project. These changes cost money and one of them is that these utility companies have to move their utilities completely away from this road as they will no more road reserve space for them. Meaning they have to reroute their services through other places. Think twice before you clap for podium speeches.

Comments are closed.