Court verdict to help check noticeable gaps in Malawi electoral systems—Expert

A social and governance commentator Makhumbo Munthali has said as  the  Constitutional Court will be delivering the much-awaited judgement on the disputed presidential election results, it is expected that it will  check if there are any noticeable gaps with country’s electoral management systems.

Mutharika (r), Chilima and Chakwera battle for presidency in court

The election dispute has caused unprecedented tension, demonstrations and violence in the country.

In the Constitutional Court case, presidential candidates in the May 21 2019 Tripartite Elections Saulos Chilima of UTM Party and Lazarus Chakwera of Malawi Congress Party (MCP) are jointly asking the court to nullify the presidential poll results. They are the first and second petitioners, respectively.

The two dragged the Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) to court after the electoral body declared President Peter Mutharika of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)the winner in the elections. They allege that the poll results were fraught with irregularities and that the electoral process was mismanaged by MEC. By virtue of the law. Mutharika was added to the case as the first respondent, while MEC is the second respondent.

In his his analysis posted on Nyasa Times, Munthali pointed out that the decision by the High Court sitting as a Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal to continue with the hearing of the election case –after being petitioned by MEC not to proceed- was one of the land mark decisions in the year 2019.

“The decision-in my view- was important for both parties involved in the election case as it would either validate or invalidate the disputed May 2019 elections,” he asserted.

He pointed out that besides, the Court hearing and subsequent verdict would partly help in answering the long-time question: whether elections in Malawi are rigged or not, the Court determination  would also help to check if there are any noticeable gaps withthe country’s  electoral management systems.

“And that if so how can we as a country push for necessary electoral reforms to address such gaps,” he said.

He also said equally important in as far as judicial accountability is concerned in 2019 was the decision by the Court to allow the public follow the case on radio (using the interpretators in the Court.

“While the verdict of the Court shall not be based on public opinion but rather evidence and relevant laws and instruments, it is important to note that by opening up to the public to follow the case closely the Courts were indirectly communicating that were open to be held accountable by the public, and that the public should be able to appreciate the decisions they would be making on the case from the very onset,” pointed out Munthali.

He continued: “ In fact, such a decision by the Courts to allow the public to appreciate the case is also part and parcel of preparing the public on the outcome of the verdict.”

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :

Sharing is caring!

0 0 vote
Article Rating
7 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Machendekhwepe
Machendekhwepe
8 months ago

Palibe nkhani apa. By the way what is rigging? The petitioners failed to prove it. In simple terms rigging is actions or processes aimed at giving a particular advantage against the rest. Was tippex, non conventional tally sheets, duplicates etc used to favour APM the answer is no. All thesr were used in all the regions even in Chakwera’s stronghold and more so for the results where he polled more votes than everybody. Was this rigging?

James Ngozo
James Ngozo
8 months ago
Reply to  Machendekhwepe

Stupid zakezo zosaneneka

Malemia
Malemia
8 months ago
Reply to  Machendekhwepe

U’cadet wanuwu ndioyaluka nawo ndithu akulu inu kkkkk

masoambeta
masoambeta
8 months ago

There are no gaps in the Malawi electoral systems. Simply, the people running the election are corruptible and stupid. The election was stolen and we all know this koma chilungamo tilibe chifukwa umunthu udathawa Tita wina ndalama. MEC is a DPP wing and we all know that DPP has got their people in MEC, MACRA, MBC and other parastatals. The whole issue began with the contract of the ballot printers. The sourcing was murky, the people who went to check the materials in Dubai are sketchy people and when the materials arrived, there were backhand movements from DPP. Ambiri tikulephela… Read more »

BRAVE NORTHERNER, NO RETREAT NO SURRENDER

PEOPLE LIKE PETER DONT KNOW DEMOCRACY BUT ONLY NEPOTISM AND TRIBALISM. FEDERALISM IS TE BEST BUT IT WILL COME TROU BLOODSED AS OPPRESSORS WOULDNT LET IT BE REALITY

Levious
8 months ago

U hot the nail on the head
We have a leader who dividws Malawi not to unite Malawians
One tribe of llomwez are more superior the the rest
Ngoziyoooo

Peter T
Peter T
8 months ago

We hope this case is going to end well! If judges ruling according Evidence we are pretty sure that, oppositions have fully Chance to win the case because their Evidence and witness was fullhouse but we must leave things in the hands of God to guide our judges on ruling day.

shares
Read previous post:
Malawi gets ‘warning signs’ on governance, array of hope in 2020 – Expert

Governance commentator Makhumbo Munthali has assessed the  performance of Malawi on several governance and accountability indicators, saying “while there have...

Close