Looking beyond Malawi traditional shipping Corridors

By now it is a foregone conclusion that Nsanje Inland waterway project will never see the light of day. This project was conceived as one way of reducing cost of inland haulage expenses for Malawi’s imports and exports. A number of issues, technical and otherwise, well documented, came into play and suddenly we are back on the drawing board.

Port of Beira remains the most highly utilized port of choice for Malawian importers and exporters seconded by port of Nacala which is serviced by rail. The costs of inland haulage between Beira, Nacala and Malawi (Lilongwe and Blantyre) hovers around $3100 to $4200 per maximum 30 tonnes cargo, containerized or breakbulk. These costs are very exorbitant and contributes to making Malawi’s exports unattractive on the global stage.

Quelimane Port – worth considering

Whilst the Malawi Government has embarked on connecting the current rail network to the Sena corridor, the pursuit of other cheaper options should be an on-going project. It is time to think beyond Beira, Nacala, Dar es Salaam and Durban.

Time has come to look at Quelimane port, wedged between the Port of Nacala in the north, Beira Port in the South and see what options it can offer Malawi. It is time to invest significant energies and efforts to make this option a bankable project.

The Port of Quelimane is a relatively small sea port on the Cuácua River approximately 22km from the Indian Ocean. At the end of the civil war, Quelimane port underwent a massive rehabilitation and expansion programme including construction of a new 230m concrete quayside. The Port has very stable power supply which is good news for cold chain supply.
More good news is that the road network from Quelimane to Milange border district with Malawi has been upgraded to bitumen standard with EDF funding. The same road network from Milange to Mocuba extends to Nampula and Nacala thereby providing a road option from Nacala Port to Malawi. This would be akin to killing two birds with one stone.

The distance between Quelimane and Blantyre, Malawi’s commercial capital is barely 400km unlike Beira at approximately 900km and 800km for Nacala respectively. This would entail a very good cost reduction in inland haulage charges with significant potential benefits to the country’s imports and exports. Transit times would also significantly benefit from the Quelimane option as driving times would be reduced to about 6 hours.

It is well documented that the Mozambique Government is planning to seriously expand the capacity of the port to handle 20 million tonnes of coal exports per year in response to the increasing demand from producers up in the central Zambezia province. This is more evidence of the strategic position of Quelimane port. This port stands to be a very important logistical hub for the remote regions in northern Mozambique, the coal producing region of Tete and landlocked Malawi.

The channel draft at the port is 4.9 – 6.1 m and the maximum vessel size that can safely berth at this port is 150 m in length. This capacity of would require some substantial investments to accommodate bigger cargo vessels, bigger container yards, warehousing and port security. With the right value proposition, serious investors and multilateral donors should be able to come in and finance the project.

All factors being constant, Quelimane port provides a very attractive option for Malawi and would be able to absorb 30% to 40% of all import and export traffic.

Malawi needs to rebuild and consolidate its bilateral relationship with Mozambique and engage them on this Quelimane corridor project. Remember the old adage, if you don’t throw the bait, you don’t catch the fish, the ball is in Malawi’s court. Unlike the execution of the ill-fated Nsanje inland waterway project, Malawi should conduct some due diligence and feasibility study but also ensure Mozambique as host if engaged and appraised in all stages.

We have more to gain from Quelimane. Vejo você em Quelimane (See you in Quelimane)

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :

Sharing is caring!

Follow us in Twitter
7 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wachambo
Wachambo
1 month ago

A serious minded nation should be looking at such contributions and grabbing them. This is really key if Malawi’s exports are to remain competitive on global markets.

But knowing Malawians, I will not be surprised if we don’t take advantage of such opportunities. Kugona too much and we lack changu pamalo. Imagine Mozambique building Hydro Power on Ruo, ife mkunono kuti thi-thi-thi-thiiiiiii. Panga pa wanthu called Malawians.

We care more for a small pot bellies and feel good that ndife mabwana. Mixxiiiii – with nothing to show to the nation kuti ubwanawo mwapanga nawo chani. Kagweleni uko.

Wonga
Wonga
1 month ago

Its really worth considering that option we can benefit alot.

Mdala
Mdala
1 month ago

Thank you for this eye opener! But what about rail transport, is it not the much cheaper option to go? Rail transport cuts cost of transport more than half, without counting the environmental and other challenges in public roads managment, especially heavy transit traffic in our cities! There is now a functional rail connection to Nacala plus our government talking now about the Sena connection to Beira. We know our decision makers are too much in road transport, this is why up to now rail and lake transport are poor and not developed! Another problem you also mentioned in the… Read more »

Kanjedza
Kanjedza
1 month ago

Very informative

Alick
Alick
1 month ago

The more the options the better the decision made. The landing costs of our imports are indeed affected by the shipping costs and to have an option that will reduce the landing costs will benefit the local Malawian.

Moya
Moya
1 month ago

Good tip for the importers/exporters. These are articles we need most bcoz Politics in malawi is a source of a heart attack.

Wachambo
Wachambo
1 month ago
Reply to  Moya

I can’t agree with you more and the media can help by bringing out such articles more. Am with you

shares
Read previous post:
Proposal to end wrong rejections and acceptance of prospective public officers in parliament

Time for some procedural reforms to strengthen the appointments of some public officers. The rejection of Martha Chizuma by parliament...

Close