Let me start by making a very brief background of the Malawi social media community, Facebook, in particular, and why it is critical to Mphwiyo’s Case and indeed the rest of big issues that affect Malawi.
With just around 320,000 users, Malawi has one of the smallest Facebook populations in the world and even in the region. But when it comes to social media, even one person can have such an impact that may resonate well beyond the Facebook community. Most Facebook users belong to Facebook groups where they share and discuss matters related to their interests. Individuals can also post on their personal walls where friends that are connected to them can view and comment on whatever has been shared and even proceed to share this on their posts where it can then be picked and shared by friends of friends and so on. When this happens the post is said to have gone viral and this is where social media tends to get dangerous.
Those who are familiar with Malawi Facebook, know that most people have complained of the existence of an organized gang that infiltrates other groups with the purpose of bullying and harassing the members who hold opposing views. The story on Facebook is that the gang is financed by some major opposition party specifically for this purpose and they are provided with high-end laptops and smartphones apart from a hefty financial compensation.
One specific group, ‘My Malawi, My Views’ almost collapsed after well meaning members left the group or were bullied into silence by this gang for simply holding opposing views or supporting other parties including the ruling one. ‘My Malawi My Views’ is now in the process of trying to clean up the group by ensuring that no bullying is allowed but it is a hard sell to make considering that most well-meaning contributors lost trust.
As of now, My Malawi My Views is still being used by this group where they now create anonymous write ups, making serious allegations against individuals holding high offices in government. They then descend on the post with vicious comments attacking that person based on allegation which they manufactured in the first place. From there they proceed to repeat the lie by sharing the post on other forums until it goes viral and gains currency as a fact. Tracing the allegation to its root will show that the original author does not exist.
Since then the CSO community has gone public to call for the Anti Corruption Bureau and the police to investigate government for what it terms ‘serious fraud’ of state resources. According to the CSO Community, the K120 million came from government coffers and Mphwiyo was shot by people who were not happy that he was giving himself a lion’s share of the loot.
As a story, this makes for very interesting reading but that is all it is – a story. For as of today, no one can prove that the K120 million came from some government account; no one – including myself – can prove that Mphwiyo was shot over the unfair sharing of the same money. As for myself, all argued in my previous article was that whatever the reason for his shooting, it had nothing to do with him trying to stop corruption because stopping corruption is well above his official pay grade and that, unless he had experienced a Damascus conversion a few hours prior to the incident, stopping underhand dealings runs contra his character.
So for our CSO community to buy into these social media rumours and start peddling them as truth in press statements is, to say the least, very embarrassing for the nation. It is this very alarmist approach that makes our CSO community very wanting. They tend to be emotional and jump to conclusions before examining the matter. Last time they screamed murder when Bingu tried to introduce local courts to be dealing with minor issues at local level in order to reduce congestion at higher courts. The CSOs claimed these would turn out to be traditional courts that Dr. Kamuzu Banda used as Kangarroo courts to deal with political opponents. Today, the court system is so clogged it has ground to a stop and those in the know will tell you that CSO did the nation a disservice.
It is this same tendency to ignore rules of engagement when it comes to engaging with government, putting aside rationalism in favour of sensationalism that they have brought on this case. They cannot prove any of the allegations they are making against government in the Mphwiyo Saga apart from what they have read on Facebook.
And this is my conclusion. Firstly, my prayer is that we all become aware of the existence of a social media gang that is trying to use social media to terrorise government officials using false allegations peddled as truth. Secondly, I pray that we allow the Mphwiyo Case to come to its rightful conclusion by allowing the right investigating authorities to carry out a professional investigation on this matter.