Court orders MEC to prove how it resolved ‘Madando 147’:  Request on bank accounts, to dismiss Malawi  poll commissioners rejected

A five-judge panel of the High Court sitting as a Constitutional Court in Lilongwe have granted from two of the presidential candidates in the May 21 Tripartite Elections who are challenging results of the  elections their request that Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC).

MCP official Maxwell Khamula pleased that the court granted them most of their wishes.-Photo by Daniel Namwini

In the case, MEC is the second respondent while President Peter Mutharika is the first respondent to a joint petition from two presidential candidates, first petitioner Saulos Chilima of UTM Party and the second petitioner Lazarus Chakwera of Malawi Congress Party(MCP).

Chief Justice Andrew Nyirenda certified the case as a constitutional matter and appointed the five-judge panel to hear the case.

In their ruling on preliminary applications Thursday,  the five-judge panel which comprises Healey Potani, Mike Tembo, Dingiswayo Madise, Ivy Kamanga and Redson Kapindu,  the court also ordered the electoral body headed by embattled Jane Mjojo Ansah to provide documents on audited election results to the court within 11 days.

The court also granted the wish of the petitioners that ballots and polling materials that would form part of evidence in court safety be kept by the Clerk of Parliament under conditions of strict security.

The judges said the electoral material be deposited with the Clerk of Parliament within 11 days from Thursday.

Chilima , the country’s immediate past vice president and Chakwera were also granted their wish by the court to access to MEC server and that bid documents  for the recruitment of election auditors and the names of the auditors  should be disclosed.

However, the court dismisses the two presidential hopefuls on their request for MEC to release bank details of its data entry clerks.

Mordecai Msiska, the lead legal counsel for Chakwera, said they want to  examine bank accounts of the country’s electoral staff to track possible bribe.

“We need to know whether any MEC staff had had transactions in their accounts that are unusual, that could not be explained in terms of inflows of funds”, he said.

But the court observed that allowing MEC access to the staff’s bank accounts would be an infringement of their right o privacy.

The court also dimissed the request by the petitioners  to dismiss MEC Commissioners in the event that the Constitutional Court finds reasonable grouns to order  fresh elections for the presidential seat.

Both Chilima and Chakwera are challenging results of the presidential election, claiming that they were rigged in favour of Mutharika who was declared winner with 38 percent.

Results MEC announced show that Chakwera trailed Mutharika with 35 percent while Chilima finished third with 20 percent of the votes.

Hearing of the full matter resumes on July 29.

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :
Follow us in Twitter

46 replies on “Court orders MEC to prove how it resolved ‘Madando 147’:  Request on bank accounts, to dismiss Malawi  poll commissioners rejected”

  1. The MCP is not planning anything good for this country.. I heard there was a secret meeting at MCP headqaurter to unleash terror and violent acts. They say Chilima should fight for them as pay back for the stolen ballot in 2014.

  2. Eleven days is too for for these thieves to do what they know best it would have been may three days

  3. MCP should NOT bank all its hopes on the court case: DPP is a mafia. MCP should continue gathering its own evidence about how DPP stole this election. Its intelligence arm (whatever it is called) should work tirelessly to get to the bottom of what exactly happened. For example why do we not know the person who supplied the Tippex throughout the country – a whole month after the elections? Who was bribing Returning Officers to doctor results? etc

  4. Where this case is going protesters should brace themselves for more demos. MCP-UTM have changed their petition from re-count to re-run. Opposition lawyers’ documents are wishy-washy and all over the place, hence, judges have demanded sanitisation of these documents. Judges have also refused to grant the opposition its prayer to have MEC Commissioners dismissed. Furthermore, judges have rejected the opposition’s plea to have bank accounts of MEC staff scrutinised. MEC has been asked to explain how it dealt with 147 madando (well, that’s the issue Dr Ansah eloquently spoke about during her Zodiak interview. Komatu bola osamwa tameki.

    1. Are you giving final case judgement? This is being insensitive beyond the word MARY!! If the courts through, not one, not two but “FIVE” judges have allowed the complainants to change whatever they want, who are you to start openly mocking the parties? How big is your party in comparison with the two parties, in terms of numbers? Can you stand it if they advance to you as they did to Alfred Chanza! Do you deny the fact that many monitors of these parties were denied final copies that the constituency returning officers produced from the mentioned ten districts? Please don’t take it AS A MERE JOKE, these people are angry and can track you down for the jazz……………………………………..!

  5. That’s what joji wina thinks and we respect his views. But why use Tipex if the figures for each monitor were the same? Did each monitor endorse the tipexed document?

  6. joji wina yu thinking capacity is very low, yu dont what yu are talking and its baseless even akid knows that the elections were rigged

  7. The elections were credible and this is exactly what the court will determine. We voted and our votes decided who should be the president..Tippex argument is childish and can only be used to challenge the results by people who do not have any tangible evidence against the results. Nzomvetsa chisoni kuti anthu ambiri alibe nzeru ndi kuzindikira kuti ma results a tippex angakhale olakwika pokhapokha ngati the figures were different from those on the forms of party monitors of which no parties disputed. For this reason it is evident that the opposition have very weak case nanjinso kukana kwa khoti kuti ma account a ma official a MEC asasunzumiridwe, ma lawyers a opposition adziwiratu kuti awa ndi masanje chabe. MEC ili ndi umboni wa momwe adayankhira madando onse 147 ku zipani ndipo mlandu ukayamba mpomwe anthu adziwe kuti a kongeresi ndi utm akungotayitsa nthawi a Malawi. Ndipo ndipemphe inbu otsutsa kuti mudzavomereze chigamulo cha khoti otherwise mtopola womwe mukuchita pano mukadzayeseranso omwe anavotera owina adzchita respond ndipo palibe yemwe adzapindule. Ndibwino kungovomereza kuti MCP ndi UTM munapombonezana nokha pa central region because UTM ate a good chunk of votes for MCP in this region while DPP’s votes were intact in the South and East. Please do not hide behind tippex excuse, mungovomera kuti zakuvutani basi.

    1. Opanda zeru ndiwe because we are starving because few stupid malawi who clap hand to thieve

      1. gwirani ntchito. Even if your party wins, you will still starve chifukwa ndiwe mlesi.

    2. Munakakhala ena munakangokhala chete. Tiyeni tidikire mmene a khoti agamulire mulanduwu. Aboma polimbikira kuti mulandu augwetse nchifukwa amadziwa kuti pali umboni waukulu osonyeza kuti chitsankho chinabedwa. Ndipo sizinhatheke a opposition kuluza mulandu umenewu. APM akudziwanso

    3. Ulibe nzeru ndi iweyo. if the elections were credible, why is MEC appealing to Supreme court to block the case? why is MEC objecting to almost everything that UTM and MCP are requesting e.g. access to servers etc? Is it not the opportunity to show the nation and world what a “wonderful” job MEC did? No wonder the court ha granted most of the pleas.

      1. Nonse amemne mwatukwana apa ndinu zitsiru. Chitsiru kuchikonola muntondo chikhalabe chitsiru

    4. I dont know which school you went Joji Wina?. I can just sense ignorance on part your arguments. Just busy making sweeping statements. Just because you voted foe DPP, then it follows that whatever other parties are claiming are nosense. Malawians we look very intelligent but very stupid in reasoning!

    5. if party monitors have results that are the same as those announced by make why should MCP and UTM go to court? By the way, why should official results have tippex and those party monitors not have.?

  8. Yes we want to know as a nation what was behind tippex by Jane Mjojo Ansa. The Concourt will make this country great again. We are praying for the judges day and night for wisdom from God only devil is a liar.

  9. we can gave JEZEBEL ANSAH ALL SORTS OF NAMES BEKOZ OF HER CAPABILITY OF HANDLING ELECTION MATTERS JOSEPHY BANDA WHY RU WORRYING ABOUT THAT DEVIL RU SAILING WITH HER THE SAME BOAT, WHO EVER IS BEHIND THAT JEZEBEL CAN CHILDREM OF DEVIL

  10. The world is watching on the judges I dont think they make a silly mistake that will destroy their reputation….

    RE RUN is POSSIBLE HERE

    1. I wish you are right, but unfortunately our political and economic situation is only of interest for selfish gains! I would include the so called development partners, but mainly our politcal leaders, law makers, judiciary, executive,chiefs….
      Sad, but money explains everything in our society!

  11. Can you write without Mwano, Mnyozo Chipongwe. Mrs Ansah is known by Justice Mrs. Dr Jane Ansah. All these she worked for them. Calling her Jane Mjojo Ansah is uncalled for and shows the writer how primitive he/she is. Please sober up! Being a journalist does not mean one should be rude to others.

    When we read various articles, we only see that ALIYENSE AFUNA KUKOMESA KWAO. We know what the Learned judges have accepted and rejected. This writer is MCP/UTM. But to be honest your demand in the street was or is still to remove Mrs Ansah. This will not happen and this must be a big blow to you. Yes the judges have requested the provision of information within 11 days, probably you have deliberately omitted the fact that MCP/UTM have to submit by Monday 1st July, 2019 why they are in court. Did they go to court without submitting what they were looking for?

    1. Whose names are these then Khakha? Muva kuwawa ndipo mwatikwana,
      Malawians are not the ones you thought you will just step on and go with it, never this time mwakhala pa chitendze.

      1. Think in 3 dimensions my friend. Madam MEC Chair consistently reiterates that all the 147 madandos were dealt with before the results were declared. If my memory is right she said a lot of them, about 130, were to do with local govt and parliamentary elections. The court will throw out the case if its basis is on new allegations which were never brought before MEC’s attention because MEC is the first point of entry of all election results complaints.
        Halloo!

    2. Joseph Banda. a very true Malawian, always obsessed with titles unlike civilized nationals like the USA. Have you ever heard Americans addressing their presidents by academic achievements. Obama was well educated too

    3. Learned people don’t mind being called even by their first names, it does not take away their accomplishments.

    4. Tippex brain, what are you defending? That is her name and when she authored a book a few years ago she had her names as Jane Mayemu Mjojo Ansah.

    5. She has messed up her reputation so bad that she does not deserve to be called by the title you are giving her, she is a disgrace to her profession, she is a disgrace to all the professional women who have worked so hard to erase the gender gap. The damage Jane Ansah has caused is irreparable

  12. wonders shall never end. Ndizofunikadi kuti this case of 21 may 2019 election tisatiledi bwino lomwe m’mene anthu amachitira chinyengo. zonsezi zikusonyezeratu m’mene akuluakulu amene akulimbana pamulanduwu akuchitira. dont forget who ever wins these case. Either chakwera side or MEC side will still be in our minds how you people playing with us.

  13. But the Financial Intelligence Unit can come with evidence of money laundering from MEC culprits and be prosecuted for both money laundering and corruption, It is not infringement of their right from money landering bill.

  14. yah apa ndiye timati ANA ADAD ALI MADZI ngati ampatsa chilima access yolowa mu server ya MEC apa ndiye ali madzi, ndikuona kafukufuku ameneyu JEZEBEL ANSAH ali mu hot soup

    1. Your ben 10 chilima has not been given the access to the server. Please read carefully. Ana a dad ukunenawo ali phee mpaka 2024.. Tayani nthawi ndi ndalama bola a court akadzagamula zosakukomerani musadzadane nawo nanga simumafuna nkhani izikomera inu basi! Munya muona coz palibe kuvbotanso apa!

  15. Thanks for the update. What the country needs is justice on these issues. The winners must be genuine winners and so should be the losers. The truth of what really happened is key.

Comments are closed.