Ntata’s Uncommon Sense: Is China relationship benefitting Malawi?

Pictures of President Peter Mutharika living it large in China, rubbing shoulders with senior Chinese government officials and generally carrying the Malawian torch at the China Africa Summit are meant to impress us that Mutharika is doing well as a leader.

He is not.

These are in fact propaganda pictures. Their sole purpose is to glorify Malawi’s bilateral relations with Beijing and make us all feel happy that more Chinese aid dollars will be making their way to Malawi to help our desperately poor country.

Fiction.

After over 10 years of Chinese Aid, the question must be asked. Is this DPP romance with China Benefitting this country? How are the poor and the vulnerable of this country benefitting from the Influx of Chinese influence?  Is Chinese aid not just enriching a few individuals and helping them cling to the very power they use to oppress the masses?

A growing number of developing countries receive billions of dollars a year in assistance, loans, and investments from China. At the 2018 China Africa Summit, Beijing has committed $100 billion to African nations. In his speech there Mutharika could not run out of adorative expressions to praise Chinese benevolence. He almost waxed lyrical.

As Beijing’s levels of foreign assistance swell and its relationship deepens with countries across Africa, Asia and Latin America, a key question emerges: What impact are investments by an opaque and repressive superpower having on governance standards in the developing world?

Findings from a Freedom House analysis, “Countries at the Crossroads,” point to the challenges that many of these recipient countries confront as they struggle to build more transparent and accountable systems. Fighting corruption and safeguarding freedom of expression and assembly are proving especially difficult. The dark side of Beijing’s engagement, with its non-transparent aid and implicit conditions, is tipping the balance in the wrong direction.

To appreciate the “China effect” on developing countries, it is essential to understand the methods Beijing is using to exert influence and warp incentives for accountable governance.

First, as international financial institutions and donor organizations seek to encourage stronger governance norms, aid from China has become an alternate source of funds. Recipient governments use these as a bargaining chip to defer measures that strengthen transparency and rule of law, especially those that could challenge elite power.

It seems to me that because buoyed by the prospects of Chinese Aid, rather than combating corruption and implementing sorely needed reforms to our governance framework and our public service delivery systems, President Mutharika will be under no pressure at all to effect reform and the government will continue to shrink the space for alterative voices and independent institutions. In turn, western donors, fearful of losing influence, have been increasingly hesitant to penalize the regime for its failures.

If you don’t believe it, just look at Guinea. In October 2010, the Guinean government announced a $7 billion deal with the China International Fund just as the international community was considering sanctions following a massacre of opposition supporters. The case underscores how even investments by a private entity, this one with ties to Beijing, can be manipulated to undermine efforts to support human rights standards.

Bottom of Form

Additionally, while “no strings attached” is commonly used to describe China’s approach in the developing world, the reality is not quite so benign. A combination of subtle and not-so-subtle conditions typically accompanies this largesse. Included among these is pressure to muzzle voices critical of the Chinese government, often undermining basic freedoms of expression and assembly in these countries. In March 2009, the South African government barred the Dalai Lama’s attendance at a pre-World Cup peace conference at the instigation of China.

And if you have not noticed, Chinese aid funds are frequently conditioned on being used to purchase goods from firms selected by Chinese officials without an open bidding process. In Namibia, anti-corruption agencies had to investigate suspected kickbacks in a deal involving security scanners purchased by the government from a company until headed by then President Hu Jintao’s son. Beijing’s response was to stonewall the investigations and activate its robust Internet censorship apparatus, sanitizing online references to the case Chinese citizens might stumble across.

Observers such as the scholar Larry Diamond have identified countries that are semi-democratic, rather than autocracies, as the most promising ground for expanding the ranks of consolidated democracies globally. The patently negative aspects of the Chinese Communist Party’s developing world influence could deal a real blow to this aspiration.Findings from Freedom House’s global analysis of political rights and civil liberties put this phenomenon in perspective. Over the past five years countries with only some features of institutionalized democratic systems have slipped significantly — 57 countries within the “partly free” category have experienced declines, while only 38 improved.

Beijing’s deepening involvement in these cases may generate a number of effects, some perhaps positive for short-term economic development. But the dark underbelly of the Chinese regime’s involvement — the opacity of its aid and the illiberal conditions that underpin it — means that over the long haul, incentives for strengthening accountable governance and basic human rights are being warped, or even reversed.

And to bring the issue back home to Malawi and underscore it all, it must be observed that of all the structures that are the showcase of Chinese Aid in Malawi, perhaps only the roads can be said to be having a visible positive effect on the lives of the majority of Malawians. The open chequebook approach used by China has meant that the DPP administration has prioritised structures that bring political narrative rather than those that the country desperately needs. I am talking here about the fact that Chinese Aid in Malawi has built a 5-star hotel, Presidential villas, a university, a parliament building and a stadium. I find it difficult to see how the common Malawian’s life has been improved through these projects.

Imagine if Chinese Aid had been used to build rail networks, new electricity generation dams and better water treatment facilities across the country!

This being an election year, I wish to appeal to you my fellow Malawians to pay close attention to the DPP and what is tells us it will use Chinese Aid for. We are already as a country sliding down all the economic and good governance indicator lists. The least we can do is encourage further sliding by cheering when our leaders tell us they will build more stadiums (a football stadium in every district is the goal, I hear), and urban shopping malls and casinos and such elitist establishments. What these country needs is stable, 24-hour electricity, good water services, hospitals that actually have medicines and equipment in them, operational rail transport systems and growth and development in the districts and the rural sector in general. This country needs jobs (yes, 1 million job a year, if possible) and business opportunities for the youths that are presently being used and abused in political tussles.

If China is a real friend of Malawi, perhaps it is time it started helping our leaders formulate their priorities properly, because so far, the DPP’s romance with China has not really benefitted Malawi in any effective way. In the final analysis, we must remember that Chinese Aid is not free money. It is a debt for which current and future generations will have to. Its use must  not be for mere political gain, but with prudence and in areas that benefit the whole of Malawi, especially the poor and most vulnerable among us.

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :

Please share this Article if you like Email This Post Email This Post

More From the World

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Erik Peterson
Guest
Erik Peterson

Rich Malawians give nothing to the poor people they live right next to, complaining about foreign aid. If Africans weren’t so exploitative of each other, foreign aid wouldn’t be needed.

master xu
Guest
master xu

malawi short of professional industry workers and farmers, and transform the agriculture things into high profit products and malawi need more privite dams make famrers have two times mazie harvests and need to farm the lack, , lack can make a lot of products, it will make malawians rich in food first, complain with others nothing will help

master xu
Guest
master xu

china govement released chineses many years ago,(all the country belongs to the party, do business is illeague), chineses embase the life and world, thats why china ecnomic grow and success, this success nothing to do with china goverment and goverment compaies, china govement give money to poor countries is to buy friends to support china in UN, there is no elections in china, the party chose the presidents themselves, chinese hate tjose things,MALAWI got those things from china every thing can not really help MALAWI and if MALAWI really want to improve the ecnomic, shouls come to us, the privite… Read more »

braveheart
Guest

My fwendo the western people u say are better forces homosexuality if u get their money,they are sponsoring wars all over the world,sponsoring small groups (CSO)to destabilise governments they hate.They don’t want total African independence..1 of their leader said African countries R shit hole..they sold us black people as merchandise the list is endless.What R u trying to say?

mfumu king
Guest
mfumu king

Mr. Ntata, me thinks that you are thinking too much. Alas, not everything, including purported benefits of Chinese Aid, can be reduced to easy to package black and white sort of intellectual conclusions.

May be, you should consider taking a sabbatical?

Achiswe
Guest

An excellent article that goes right to the heart of the problems of dealing with the Chinese. The Chinese do not give economic ‘aid’ freely; there is always a quid pro quo that is to the benefit of the Chinese. To date Chinese aid has done little or nothing to advance the prosperity of Malawi as a whole. The poor remain poor and the country continues lack the structures that would propel it forward. It will be very interesting to see in detail what ‘benefits’ for the country the President has brought back from Bejing. He spent his time there… Read more »

master xu
Guest
master xu

the problem is that, china’s goverment just want to give small money to poor countries to get support in UN, the china’s goverment can not really help MALAWIANS, as a chinese, i dont like it deeply. and the president go to china if the talk to goverment, he only can know how to control the army, media, people, and how to control all the contry’s resoures, but if president come to private companies, he will get really help for MALAWIANS, and can help two contrys people really love each other,😁

master xu
Guest
master xu

the problem is that, china goverment just want to give some money to buy support in UN, not really help malawi, if president just visit goverment and goverment companies, he can get nothing back, only how to control army, media, people, and how to control all the country reaources, but if he come to private companies, he will get really help…

Ndangodutsamo
Guest

I agree with the author 100%. And wina wake wayimba Nyimbo nkumati Lozani zanu. Dpp showcasing Bingu Stadium, BICC, Parliament, Nsanje port (though sakumaitchula), Nkhatabay road, MUST, (Ndata farm though sakumaitchula). But honestry speaking it is now 13 years DPP in power …..Zoloza zake zingakhale zimenezi….Zatipindulira chaini ife a Malawi ….We are watching Lake Malawi and water from Mulanje Mountain through Ruo river draining into the Indian Ocean yet ife nkumasowa madzi, magetsi, irrigation farming (chakudya), Farmers’ produce rotting because there are no buyers, no processing factories or sale at a much lower rate than input, we are watching children… Read more »

Angela masuku
Guest
Angela masuku

Countries which are assessed by international organisations as not suitable to acquire any more loans due to the high repayment as borrowing more will finish the economy ..such country LOOK east where muthatika just came bwck from on a chartered jet which cost $2509 an hour from take off in Lilongwe and landing back in Lilongwe every day. Corrupt governments negotiate bad deals like high interests loans in which their govt repay a very high interest for years and years before even starting to repay the principal.. In return they get gifts like houses build for them…China will borrow u… Read more »

master xu
Guest
master xu

chinese(not china goverment, and goverment compaies) know how to use small resources to do development and make life better, thats malaians really need, malawi development depends on malawian, and if president come to us, the private companies, we can change the whole country in five years, we can build a mazie price steable system thorough business, and we can build more private dams, and we can fram the lake, the lake is the best land for malawians, we can bring our factories to malawi , malawi need trans the agriculture products to be high profit products do not come to… Read more »

More From Nyasatimes