3 weeks in the cell, Chisale hoping for release on Wednesday

August 3, 2020 Wanga Gwede -Nyasa Times 15 Comments

Former president Peter Mutharika’s security aide Norman Chisale is hoping that the gods will smile for him this Wednesday and go home on bail.

Chisale seeking bail

After already three weeks spent in the cooler, Chisale has to spend two more nights there before hearing for his bail application commences on Wednesday.

His lawyer Chancy Gondwe confirmed Monday morning that his client is scheduled to appear before court for bail on Wednesday this week on the murder charge of ACB official Issa Njauju.

Chisale was first arrested for fraud and money laundering on July 14 2020 before he was rearrested for the new charge on July 17 2020.

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :
Follow us in Twitter

15 replies on “3 weeks in the cell, Chisale hoping for release on Wednesday”

  2. APM should not allow this man close to him because he will assassinate him so that there is no evidence. If he was personal things in the name of the president he will make sure to eliminate him so that there would be no one to ask for verification.

  3. You did not give Issa Njaunju right to life but your want freedom. Very strange. You do not deserve any leniency and I will hate the judge who will give you freedom

  10. Mr Norman Paulos Chisale, this is the world. Power has its limitations. You stole, killed and undermined police officers and the army. We were just watching you. Now its time to pay all those sins at once. Your Mutharika will not rescue you but hang you as he has started by denying any knowledge of you using his TPIN to import huge tons of cement. SO you and your wife are answering different murder charges, what a family

    1. We should not forget that arresting someone for an alleged crime does not mean they are guilty.
      The onus will be on prosecution to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt.
      Take for instance, a case where there is written
      Evidence of a debt, but the debtor repaid the money without ensuring that the documentary evidence was cancelled by the creditor.
      In such a situation if the creditor sues the debtor alleging non payment, I presume the courts will say,
      “what better evidence do we have that the debts remains outstanding than the uncancelled document which the creditor has produced to us.”

      Accordingly the court will order the debtor to repay the money for a second time.

      The overriding principle is that disputes should be decided according to the best evidence which could be produced, and in this scenario the best evidence was the uncancelled document.

      Making loudest noises on social media or newspapers does not bring anyone even one millimeter closer to be found guilty.

      We have been here before. Kamuzu appeared in the same court allegedly being accused of authourising the murder of 4 cabinet ministers.
      I do not have to reming you how the state failed to prove its case. Kamuzu was free at Mudi

Comments are closed.