Mphwiyo’s lawyer quiz Kalonga in Cashgate case

Cashgate convict Leonard Kalonga on Monday  told the High Court in Lilongwe that he was not aware that  former Ministry of Finance budget director Paul Mphwiyo was in United States  between August 18 and 28 2013, part of the period he claimed the looting was taking place.

Lawyer for Mphwiyo, Titus Mvalo SC

Kalonga—who was convicted of charges of conspiracy to defrauding government, facilitating money laundering and money laundering— is on record telling the court that Mphwiyo and others lured him into the plunder of public resources at Capital Hill.

He is a State witness in the case which Mphwiyo and 17 others are charged with conspiracy to defraud government, holding property belonging to government, theft, money laundering, fraudulently issuing 24 cheques worth K2.4 billion, abuse of public office and usage of proceeds of crime.

When defence lawyer Titus Mvalo quizzed Kalonga in the witness box that the period of August 18 and 28 2013 Mphwiyo was in the US, he said he had no knowledge about that.

“Since you are telling me now, maybe he was in the US,” said Kalonga.

Mvalo said he would want Mphwiyo’s passport which is being held by the State should be released to prove that the former budget director had travelled to US.

The defence lawyer also punched holes in Kalonga’s credibility and oral evidence.

Kalonga was quizzed more on government funding and transactions.

He is on record telling the court that Mphwiyo asked him (Kalonga) and tourism ministry’s chief accountant George Banda to  be at the centre of siphoning money out of public coffers.

According to Kalonga, it was Mphwiyo who explained the Cashgate scheme to him and later asked him to sell the idea to people who matter at the Ministry of Tourism.

Kalonga said Mphwiyo also instructed him to recruit contractors within the construction industry to avoid suspicion when drawing large sums of money.

“Initially the scheme entailed actually requesting for extra funding and production of fake documents to process the payments, but once Mphwiyo became budget director, the modus operandi changed. There was no longer need for the Office of the Director of Public Procurement to issue no objection letters to the department of buildings to issue fake interim completion certificates. It was said that the Accountant General Department was fully on board,” reads the court statement.

Mvalo asked Kalonga if it was practical for budget director to impose a list of suppliers on a ministry.

“What are the tasks of the budget director? Can somebody from outside impose a vendor on the list,” Mvalo asked Kalonga.

“I wouldn’t know,” said Kalonga on the roles  and responsbilities of the budget director.

Mvalo put to Kalonga that any funding above K50 millio requires the approvals of a senior officer beyond the authority of Secretary to the Treasuty and the Minister of Finance.

Kalonga said he could not say if Secretary to Treasury or Finance Minister  were  involved.

Follow and Subscribe Nyasa TV :

Please share this Article if you like Email This Post Email This Post

More From the World

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Timve Zoona
It’s a shame government prosecutors tend to be timid and made to look like fools by their private practice counterparts otherwise Mphiyo’s lawyer has just presented to government with some powerful ammunition: ** Mphwiyo may have indeed been in the States but as a civil servant a mere budget director what was he doing in the States? On whose orders? ** If the trip was privately funded where did he get the cash on his civil servants salary? ** We all know that Cashgate money did not go through normal government channels and as such as long as someone had… Read more »

Timve Zoona, the lawyers handling the case have more and ready information. What you are presenting here are your thoughts, not really what is on the ground. And by the way, don’t rely on Nyasa Times reporters, they rarely report court proceedings correctly.

Chaponda Mbala

Mr Mvalo,, pa umunthu wanu, simukudziwa kuti Mphwiyo ndimbala ndamene anayambisa cashgate? kumakhala ndi mtima othandiza dziko man,, tindalama amakugailani mphwiyo kumamwera ma whiskey muma Lilongwe Golf Club umu mwati muzidifende mbavazi


Ndipo I always wonder why our lawyers always defend mbavazi. Mongadi Mvalo sakudziwa kuti Mphwiyo ndi wakuba? Nkale lonse……. Ndalama zomwe akuwapatsazo ndi tax payers money..


Kamulonde, the law requires that a suspect be represented by a defence lawyer.


You have your job and Mvalo his too. He is only doing his job within the law. Umbuli bwanji? So to you once one is suspected then amangidwe without trial? Then that would be worse than a village operation if you fool Kamulonde and Chaponda Mbala were to be part of the judicial system. After the defence, Mphwiyo may be convicted but not without due process of the law

More From Nyasatimes